Congressional Budget Office

Supporting the congress since 1975

Congressional Budget Office

contact cbo

  • home
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo

Finance

The 2007–2009 financial crisis and recession were triggered in part by a near collapse of some large financial institutions, a sharp contraction in the availability of credit, and a large drop in house prices. In response, federal support for financial institutions and credit markets substantially increased. CBO quantifies the costs and risks of policy proposals related to federal credit and insurance programs, banking and capital markets, government-sponsored enterprises such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and other federal financial activities.

Sub-Topics:

  • Government Sponsored Enterprises

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (17)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO Releases Report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program—March 2012

blog post

March 28, 2012


  • Supplemental Material

  • Blog Post

related publications


  • TARP—March 2012

    March 28, 2012
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program: Infographic

graphic

March 28, 2012

read complete document  (png, 236 kb)

  • Supplemental Material

  • Blog Post

related publications


  • TARP infographic

    March 28, 2012
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program—March 2012

report

March 28, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 186 kb)

Highlights

In October 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Division A of Public Law 110-343) established the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to enable the Department of the Treasury to promote stability in financial markets through the purchase and guarantee of "troubled assets." Section 202 of that legislation requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to submit semiannual reports on the costs of the Treasury’s purchases and guarantees of troubled assets. The law also requires the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to prepare an assessment of each OMB report within 45 days of its issuance. That assessment must discuss three elements:

  • The costs of purchases and guarantees of troubled assets,
  • The information and valuation methods used to calculate those costs, and
  • The impact on the federal budget deficit and debt.

To fulfill its statutory requirement, CBO has prepared this report on transactions completed, outstanding, and anticipated under the TARP as of February 22, 2012. By CBO’s estimate, $431 billion of the initially authorized $700 billion will be disbursed through the TARP, and the cost to the federal government of the TARP’s transactions (also referred to as the subsidy cost), including grants for mortgage programs that have not yet been made, will amount to $32 billion.

The estimated cost of the TARP stems largely from assistance to American International Group (AIG), aid to the automotive industry, and grant programs aimed at avoiding foreclosures. Other transactions with financial institutions will, taken together, yield a net gain to the federal government, in CBO’s estimation.

CBO’s current assessment of the cost of the TARP’s transactions is $2 billion lower than the $34 billion estimate shown in the agency’s previous report on the TARP (issued in December 2011). That decrease in the estimated cost stems primarily from an increase in the market value of the government’s investments in AIG and General Motors (GM), partially offset by added costs resulting from new initiatives in the Treasury’s mortgage programs. CBO’s current estimate for all TARP transactions is less than OMB’s latest estimate of $68 billion, largely because CBO projects a lower cost for the mortgage programs.

When the TARP was created, the U.S. financial system was in a precarious condition, and the transactions envisioned and ultimately undertaken engendered substantial financial risk for the federal government. Nevertheless, the net costs directly associated with the TARP, when taken in isolation, have been toward the low end of the range of possible outcomes anticipated when the program was launched—in part because funds invested, loaned, or granted to participating institutions through the Federal Reserve and government programs other than the TARP helped limit those costs.



  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 4014, a bill to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to information provided to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

cost estimate

March 19, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 16 kb)

  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

CBO's Reestimate of the President's 2013 Mandatory Proposals for Postsecondary Education - March 2012 Baseline

data or technical information

March 16, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 16 kb)

  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 665, Excess Federal Building and Property Disposal Act of 2012

cost estimate

March 13, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 21 kb)

  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 3606, Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2011

cost estimate

March 2, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 26 kb)

monthly archive

  • May 2013 (17)
  • April 2013 (14)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (11)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (10)
  • October 2012 (4)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (5)
  • July 2012 (11)
  • June 2012 (8)
browse all
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Should Fair-Value Accounting Be Used to Measure the Cost of Federal Credit Programs?

blog post

March 5, 2012


  • blog post
  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

Fair-Value Accounting for Federal Credit Programs

report

March 5, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 713 kb)

Highlights

Federal credit assistance supports such private activities as home ownership, postsecondary education, and certain commercial ventures. Excluding the activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, at the end of fiscal year 2011, about $2.7 trillion was outstanding in federal direct loans and loan guarantees.

CBO examines fair-value accounting as an alternative to the current approach for measuring the costs to the government of federal credit programs.

FCRA Treatment Does Not Give a Comprehensive Accounting of Federal Costs

The Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA) requires the costs of credit assistance to be measured by discounting—using rates on U.S. Treasury securities—expected future cash flows associated with a loan or loan guarantee to a present value at the time of disbursement.

In CBO’s view, FCRA-based cost estimates do not provide a full accounting of what federal credit programs actually cost the government because they do not incorporate the full cost of the risk associated with the loans.

Fair-Value Accounting Provides a More Comprehensive Measure of Federal Costs

Fair-value accounting recognizes market risk—the component of financial risk that remains even after investors have diversified their portfolios as much as possible, and that arises from shifts in current and expected macroeconomic conditions—as a cost to the government. To incorporate the cost of such risk, fair-value accounting calculates present values using market-based discount rates. Thus, fair-value estimates often imply larger costs to the government for issuing or guaranteeing a loan than do FCRA-based estimates.

Using FCRA-based estimates instead of fair-value estimates has important consequences for the way policymakers might perceive the cost of credit assistance:

  • The costs reported in the budget are generally lower than the costs to even the most efficient private financial institutions for providing credit on the same terms;
  • The budgetary costs are almost always lower than those of other federal spending that imposes equivalent true costs on taxpayers; and
  • Purchases of loans at market prices appear to make money for the government and, conversely, sales of loans at market prices appear to result in losses.

Fair-Value Accounting Has Challenges

  • Government agencies would incur training expenses and the cost of developing new valuation models.
  • Fair-value cost estimates would be somewhat more volatile, although factors that also affect FCRA estimates would continue to be the main cause of volatility.
  • Fair-value estimating would require analysts to make additional judgments that could introduce inconsistencies in how costs of different programs are evaluated.


  • Sign Up For CBO Emails
  • Sign up for All CBO RSS Feeds

H.R. 3606, the Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2011

cost estimate

March 2, 2012

read complete document  (pdf, 26 kb)

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • next ›
  • last »
  • about
  • topics
  • cost estimates
  • my cbo
  • press
  • privacy, security, and copyright policies
  • our business opportunities
  • sitemap

work at cbo

learn more about working at cbo and check out the agency’s career opportunities

stay connected

get cbo’s email updates