International Trade and Finance
- Cost Estimate
H.R. 5092, Reinforcing American-Made Products Act of 2016
As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 13, 2016
- Report
The Budgetary Effects of the United States’ Participation in the International Monetary Fund
CBO describes the procedures it uses to develop a market-based estimate of the cost of new U.S. commitments to the International Monetary Fund that reflects the small risk that the IMF could incur large losses.
- Cost Estimate
H.R. 3611, Export-Import Bank Reform and Reauthorization Act of 2015
Letter to the Honorable Tom Price Regarding the Budgetary Impact of H.R. 3611
- Cost Estimate
S. 1268, Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2015
As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Finance on April 22, 2015
- Cost Estimate
H.R. 1892, Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2015
As ordered reported by the House Committee on Ways and Means on April 23, 2015
- Cost Estimate
S. 995, Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015
As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Finance on April 22, 2015
- Cost Estimate
H.R. 1890, Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015
As ordered reported by the House Committee on Ways and Means on April 23, 2015
- Cost Estimate
S. 1463, Captive Primate Safety Act
As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on July 30, 2014
- Report
Testimony on Estimates of the Cost of the Credit Programs of the Export-Import Bank
CBO finds that Ex-Im Bank’s credit programs would generate a budgetary cost using fair-value accounting—as opposed to savings under the current approach for measuring costs—because it more fully accounts for risk the government takes on.
- Report
Fair-Value Estimates of the Cost of Selected Federal Credit Programs for 2015 to 2024
The budgetary costs shown for selected credit programs would be higher under fair-value accounting—an alternative to the current approach for measuring costs—because it more fully accounts for the cost of the risk the government takes on.